Posted by AzBlueMeanie:
Arizona Governor Jan Brewer said in a press conference today that following a meeting with President Obama she is "encouraged that there's going to be much better dialogue" about the illegal immigration problem her state faces.
She added though that the question of a Department of Justice challenge to the constitutionality of the law was "brushed over" by the President. Brewer: Obama 'Brushed Over' Question Of DOJ Challenge To Immigration Law:
Regarding a DOJ challenge of the law, Obama apparently "indicated that he was leaving that up to the Department of Justice" itself. Brewer added: "That was brushed over a little bit."
Well, Gov, that's because unlike here in Arizona where the Governor and Legislature dictate to the Attorney General what he can and cannot do, Brewer wants to pick who defends SB 1070; Goddard says it's his job, the president does not dictate to the Attorney General the legal positions that office takes on litigation. The Attorney General is supposed to be independent and not the president's personal consigliere, despite the bad example set by Alberto Gonzalez with your friend George Bush.
Brewer said that she and Obama had a "cordial discussion" about illegal immigration, and "agreed to try to work together" and become "more closely coordinated in our efforts and information."
She said the President promised some of his staff would be going out to Arizona within a couple of weeks to take a closer look at the problems on the border. Brewer added that this encouraged her, but "I hope that's not wishful thinking. I hope that is positive thinking."
The White House released the following statement following in the meeting:
The President had a good meeting with Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona at the White House today to discuss a range of critical issues of mutual interest, including the President's comprehensive plan to secure the Southwest border and the unprecedented resources his Administration has devoted to that effort. The President and Governor Brewer also discussed the President's decision to deploy up to an additional 1,200 requirements-based National Guard troops to the border and his upcoming request to Congress of $500 million in supplemental funds for enhanced border protection and law enforcement activities as part of that integrated strategy. The President listened to Governor Brewer's concerns, and noted that the Administration's ongoing border protection and security efforts have increased pressure on illegal trafficking organizations through record seizures of illegal weapons and bulk cash transiting from the United States to Mexico, resulted in significant seizures of illegal drugs headed into the United States, lowered the average violent crime statistics in states along the Southwest Border, and reduced illegal immigration into the United States.
Despite the significant improvements, the President acknowledged the understandable frustration that all Americans share about the broken immigration system, and the President and Governor agreed that the lack of action to fix the broken system at the federal level is unacceptable. As he did at the recent meeting with Senate Republicans, the President underscored that security measures alone won't fix the broken borders, there needs to be comprehensive immigration reform that includes: lasting and dedicated resources by which to secure our borders and make our communities safer; holding unscrupulous employers accountable who hire workers illegally and exploit them and providing clear guidance for the many employers who want to play by the rules; and requiring those who have come here illegally to pay a fine, pay back taxes, learn English, and get right with the law. The President urged Governor Brewer to be his partner in working in a bipartisan manner on comprehensive immigration reform to implement the type of smart, sensible, and effective solutions the American people expect and deserve from their federal government. Regarding Arizona law SB1070, the President reiterated his concern with the measure, including that a patchwork of different state immigration regulations around the country would interfere with the federal government's responsibility to set and enforce immigration policy.
H/T Talkingpointsmemo.com
Discover more from Blog for Arizona
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
AZ BlueMeanie, “right on” on your response to JT3!!
Take a chill pill. I use this literary device to create a character in a narrative the same way that Molly Ivins did in referring to Gov. Rick Perry (TX) as “Governor Goodhair” and George W. Bush as “Shrub.” By the way, the “Accidental Governor” label has been picked up in the national news media, which indicates it has been an effective framing and narrative. I can’t please all the people all the time; there will always be someone critical. It’s like my mother always said, “if you don’t like what’s on TV you can change the channel or turn it off and read a book.”
As someone who has worked with the legislature over many years I can assure you that there is no “common ground” to move forward in a “constructive fashion,” particularly if Jan Brewer were to continue as governor. As I have said many times, “this is not your father’s GOP.” The radical extremists have taken over the asylum. The only chance this state has is for voters to kick these radical Republicans out of office and to give the Democrats a chance to reverse course in November. Focus on what is truly important.
I’m no fan of Gov Brewer or the repubs, however I am getting a little sick and tired of this BS of referring to the Gov as “Accidental”.
Mr/Mz Meanie are you taking the position that an organized form of government does not need a structured form of succession? Are you believing that the citizens didnt realize the Sec of State is first in line to step into a vacant governors position, when they voted?
Why is it that you do not refer to Ms Napolitano as “the Run to Washington” gal? After all Ms. Napolitano did vacate her elected seat, thus leaving us in a lurch, just as Ms Palin did in Alaska. Although Mz. N did stay in public service, I would presume the furthering of her career must of been high on her list of reasons.
I believe you excersize a double standard and engage in some of the same practises you critizise others for. These disrespectful adjectives perpetuate alienation of others and are an impediment to finding a common ground while we try to move forward in a constructive fashion. I would appreciate your cleaning up the language and rising to a higher level of expression. Actually I think the current behavor cheapens your intellectual presence. I believe you have alot to offer and find your considerations interesting to say the least.
Sincerely
JT