The City of Bisbee wins (sorta) on civil unions


Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

A couple of weeks ago, Attorney General Tom "banned for life by the SEC" Horne was threatening to sue the City of Bisbee over a newly enacted civil unions ordinance, at the prompting of Mullah Cathi Herrod and her Christian Taliban at the Center for Arizona Policy (CAP).

It looks like the Mullah will not get her lawsuit to call down hellfire on gay couples who want to make a public commitment to one another, and the City of Bisbee wins (sorta) on its civil unions ordinance. The city will just need to tweak its ordinance. Cities, AG strike deal on rights of partners:

Attorney General Tom Horne said Monday he won't challenge city ordinances, like the one passed in Bisbee, that detail the rights of those in civil unions.

Horne said there's nothing wrong with cities requiring hospitals to let partners visit or even those in registered unions getting family rates at the local swimming pool.

But he objected to a provision in the new Bisbee ordinance that mentioned seven specific rights, like community property and inheritance. Horne said that made it seem like those who register as partners get those rights despite specific state statutes reserving them to married couples.

Bisbee withdrew its new ordinance earlier this month after Horne threatened to sue the city.

After a closed-door meeting Monday with attorneys representing Bisbee and other cities, Horne acknowledged domestic partners do, in fact, have those rights. In fact, so does every other couple in Arizona, whether registered in a civil union or not.

But the key is those rights are not automatic to domestic partners. Instead, they require some affirmative action, like taking title to a property as joint tenants or executing a will.

Horne said even if Bisbee's ordinance does not purport to grant new rights – a contention disputed by city officials – he feared those reading it or any other local law modeled after it would think they don't need such documents if they are in a registered domestic partnership.

"If there were no civil union, they might realize they need to write a will," he said. "And so we were fearful that people would be misled into not taking those precautions that they normally should take with wills or contracts or other relationships among people that are recognized under Arizona law."

Jennifer Pizer, an attorney with Lambda Legal, agreed with Horne's legal analysis.

* * *

"I think it's very helpful as a practical matter when a city recites a range of things that couples can do and is specific about what the city is doing," Pizer said. "This gives guidance to couples."

Pizer said, though, the victory is bigger than just that Bisbee gets to have its ordinance, though it needs to be rewritten. She said just having cities list rights is a public relations victory – and perhaps a step down the road toward statewide recognition of couples.

"An important part of reducing discrimination against anyone, but specifically diverse families, is having government show a recognition of the commitment, the financial obligations couples take on, the fact that couples are having children," she said.

"The range of things that are called out by this ordinance show that the city sees these families functioning as other families, despite the lack of recognition in state law," Pizer said. "As attitudes change, as respect is afforded, then we get closer to the time when we can actually change the law to reflect that respect and provide all the protections."

The compromise that came out of the closed-door meeting is that Horne will not challenge local laws that mention things like property and inheritance.

"They can list what contracts people can enter into and what they can provide for in their wills, and other things that they're entitled to do under current law," he said.

"And then they can say, if you enter into these contracts, which you have a right to do now, we will recognize that and we will make a record of it, we will formalize it, we will celebrate it, whatever they want to do," Horne said.

In fact, he said cities are free to actually make copies of these various draft contracts and wills available to those who register – as long as city officials do not start giving legal advice.

That stance appeared to satisfy Pizer. "The city is calling out that couples can make those agreements," she said. "And the city will then provide a mechanism for recording those agreements."

* * *

Pizer and Horne said Monday that the Bisbee officials will work with someone from Horne's office to ensure that the new language meets with his approval but accomplishes the city's goals of informing people of their rights.

So it appears as if everyone is cool with civil unions in Arizona except for the "God hates gays" haters at the Center for Arizona Policy. I really hope the U.S. Supreme Court goes for a landmark civil rights decision in the gay marriage cases, and puts an end to this state-sanctioned discrimination nonsense.

The Arizona Republic's E.J. Montini wrote a nice opinion praising the City of Bisbee. The little town that could: Bisbee.