The Arizona Capitol Time (subscription required) reports that “The financial fallout from repealing Obamacare without replacing it will make everything else Arizona’s policymakers have so far worried about look like small potatoes.” Do you have $1 billion to spare? What Obamacare repeal would look like for Arizona:
Officials from the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, the state’s Medicaid program, have mapped out several scenarios if the federal law is abolished outright, and the options aren’t pretty. Under the worst scenarios, a straight repeal would devastate Arizona’s health care infrastructure, undermine the state’s much-touted managed care system, and leave a gaping hole in the state budget.
It’s unclear what a replacement would look like, but officials say Arizona will face a steeper challenge under a block grant, under which the states would have more flexibility in running Medicaid but face more financial exposure since they would get a set amount, instead of a guarantee that the federal government will shoulder the burden of insuring anyone who is eligible. Additionally, Arizona is under a voter mandate to insure all low-income residents, and the courts are unlikely to accept in perpetuity policymakers’ argument that the state can’t afford to adhere to the people’s will.
Congressional inaction amid so much talk of repealing Obamacare would also sow chaos on the insurance market place, as insurers get increasingly unsure about how many will enroll, and enrollees face uncertainty about their ability to keep their health plans.
Here are a few numbers to think about.
would be sucked out of Arizona’s economy if the repeal resulted in eliminating medical coverage for low-income childless adults, as well as individuals who earn between 100 and 133 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL).
For a family of four, 138 percent FPL equals to an annual income of $33,534.
If 425,000 residents lose Medicaid coverage, lawmakers would have to find $328 million more than what the state currently spends on health care.
Arizonans or 28 percent of the state’s population currently get health insurance through AHCCCS.
of the AHCCCS population is between 19 and 64 years old. 44 percent are between the ages of 0 and 18.
$1 billion more
That’s how much the general fund would have to shoulder if Medicaid expansion was rolled back, and the federal government provides only regular matching funds to insure individuals who earn up to 100 percent of the federal poverty level. This scenario removes $600 million from Arizona’s economy, and 116,000 Arizonans will lose Medicaid coverage.
It would also cost the state $1 billion more if eligibility for the expansion population (those who earn between 100 and 133 percent FPL) is frozen, while the state still provides insurance coverage to those who earn up to 100 percent FPL at the regular federal matching levels. Under this scenario, nobody will get immediately kicked out of AHCCCS. Instead, members will drop off as their eligibility expires, and they can’t re-apply for coverage.
For context, $1 billion is about 10 percent of the state’s annual budget and roughly pays for the spending of all smaller state agencies, not counting money for education, health care, corrections, the universities, welfare, and child safety.
is available to spend in the next fiscal year, if the governor and lawmakers want to maintain a structurally-balanced budget. That’s not counting $460 million in the state’s rainy day fund account.
That’s the share of federal spending for Arizona’s Medicaid program. Currently, the feds assume the bigger risk of providing health care coverage, as the entitlement program guarantees coverage of anybody who is eligible and the federal commitment to help the states in paying for the program is open-ended.
And you are only now hearing it from the Arizona media, something it should have been reporting on during the election.
With a Tea-Publican governor and legislature opposed to ever raising taxes for any reason, their alternative health care plan for you will be “perhaps you should die and decrease the surplus population.”