The failure to test for coronavirus is about to test the surge capacity of our hospitals

0
589

The United States is the most advanced and wealthiest nation in the world. So why is it that we are so far behind other nations in the ability to test for infectious diseases to prevent the spread of an epidemic?

Harvard global health professor Dr. Ashish Jha on Thursday lamented the haphazard U.S. response to the coronavirus pandemic, describing it as “among the very worst in the world.” Harvard Health Professor Slams Trump’s ‘Catastrophic Failure’ On Coronavirus:

“Certainly among all the major countries,” Jha told MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, noting how “every major country has more testing than we do across Europe, South Korea, Japan, even Vietnam and Iran until recently have been doing a better job testing than we have.”

Jha said the testing failure is “really mind-boggling” and makes it “really hard to get a grip on how many people actually have the infection, where the infections are, how widespread it is and what we can do to respond to it.”

“I see this as just a catastrophic failure on the part of the federal government and the federal leadership,” said Jha, who is also director of the Harvard Global Health Institute.

Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told Congress on Thursday that the US health system is “failing” at providing adequate testing for the coronavirus. Top Health Official Said The US Is “Failing” At Testing For The Coronavirus:

“It is a failing. Let’s admit it,” Fauci, a top-ranking member of the White House’s Coronavirus Task Force, told the House Committee on Oversight and Reform during a hearing on US coronavirus preparedness and response.

“The system does not — is not really geared to what we need right now,” said Fauci. When it comes to testing, “the idea of anybody getting it, easily, the way people in other countries are doing it — we’re not set up for that. Do I think we should be? Yes. But we are not.”

* * *

So far, more than 1,300 people are known to be infected in the US and at least 38 people have died. But public health experts have warned hundreds to thousands more could already be infected — undetected due to a shortfall in testing that has drastically hampered an aggressive response to the virus’s spread nationwide.

The testing problems began with an initial distribution of faulty tests last month by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to state officials, combined with narrow criteria for who could be tested.

A BuzzFeed News review of testing in all 50 states and the District of Columbia found a big discrepancy between testing conducted so far and the numbers of available tests promised by the Trump administration. And even when people have been approved to get tested, they’ve still faced obstacles in getting the test administered and then have had to wait days for the results.

Current estimates peg the total number of US tests conducted at fewer than 9,000 tests to date. By contrast, South Korea is now reportedly testing up to 20,000 people per day for the virus.

What this coronavirus pandemic demonstrates is that the U.S. healthcare system needs to do a systematic review of what every other country in the world is doing to determine what actually works, and what has not worked, and then enact a “best practices” protocol to improve our infectious disease capabilities, and then fully fund it. But this is a long-term solution.

In the short-term, we should all hope to be represented in Congress by someone as fierce as Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA), who demands answers and won’t take any shit from evasive witnesses. Congresswoman Porter is trying to save American lives, and is kicking butt and taking names. Rep. Katie Porter Just Got a Trump Administration Official to Promise Free Coronavirus Tests:

As Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) explained during a House oversight committee hearing on Thursday, an uninsured person who goes to an emergency room for testing could face bills adding up to well over $1,000. If that person needs to be put in isolation, the cost could be far more. “Fear of these costs are going to keep people from being tested, from getting the care they need, and from keeping their community safe,” she said.

But, as Porter discovered, there’s a little-known federal regulation that gives the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director the power to use government funds to cover the costs for “care and treatment of individuals subject to medical examination, quarantine, isolation, and conditional release” during a health crisis. And during Thursday’s hearing, she appeared to convince the CDC’s director, Dr. Robert Redfield, to agree to use that authority pay for COVID-19 testing to be provided “free to every American regardless of insurance.”

After pulling out her trademark whiteboard to calculate the potentially astronomical costs for an uninsured person to be tested for COVID-19, Porter grilled Redfield on the existing rules. Redfield hesitated at first, saying only that he would “review it in detail” with CDC and Department of Health and Human Services officials. Porter wasn’t satisfied with that response and noted that she and two of her colleagues—Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) and Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.)—had first raised the issue in a letter to Trump administration officials last week. “You need to make to make a commitment to the American people so they come in to get tested,” she said. “You can operationalize the payment structure tomorrow.”

With that, Redfield seemed to have a change of heart. “I think you’re an excellent questioner,” he said, “so my answer is yes.”

Porter is already promising to hold the administration to this commitment. “Dr. Redfield was under oath when he testified that he would make coronavirus testing free, and the American people rightly expect that witnesses appearing before Congress are wholly truthful,” Porter said in a statement provided to Mother Jones. “I expect Dr. Redfield to follow through on his commitment, and you can bet I’ll hold him to account if he doesn’t.”

The New York Times reported that Sick People Across the U.S. Say They Are Being Denied the Coronavirus Test. As Time reported, there’s been a sort of comedy of errors in which the necessary combination of test kits, facilities where tests can safely be conducted, and labs where tests can be sent, simply doesn’t exist. Some patients have been billed by their insurers under cost-sharing provisions in their policy, despite the existence of the federal law that Rep. Porter pointed out exists but which has not been invoked by the Trump administration.

Unfortunately, even if the U.S. could miraculously produce millions of coronavirus testing kits today and ramp up its testing labs, it is already too late. The coronavirus is spreading exponentially through community spread with no ability to trace infected individuals any longer due to the weeks long failure to do adequate testing. ‘It’s Just Everywhere Already’: How Delays in Testing Set Back the U.S. Coronavirus Response. Social distancing, shutting everything down to prevent transmission, is now the best option. But this will cause major economic disruption.

We are only days or weeks ahead of an expected surge of patients who are going to overwhelm a fragile U.S. healthcare system. Buzzfeed News reports, The Coronavirus Outbreak Could Spread To Millions In The US. We Don’t Have Nearly Enough Hospital Beds If It Does.

The new front lines of the coronavirus pandemic are emergency rooms, where hospitals are desperately readying for repeats of scenes of overwhelmed wards in Wuhan, China, Milan, and Tehran, as the outbreak crests this month in the USA.

Hospital groups on Wednesday appealed to President Trump to declare the COVID-19 outbreak a national disaster or emergency, a declaration that would allow hospitals to add more hospital beds and enable out-of-state doctors to assist in the event of a crisis.

First, the numbers to date: More than 1,300 US cases were reported as of Thursday, with beachhead community outbreaks in Washington state, California, and New York. Cities like Atlanta, Miami, Boston, and Denver are reporting dozens of cases each. Total case numbers have grown at a rough average rate of 30% a day in the US since the last week of February.

At that rate, the US will have more than 8,000 cases by next week, 40,000 cases in two weeks, and nearly 150,000 cases by the end of the month. Around 5% of those cases might be critical ones, leaving 7,500 Americans with life-threatening cases of COVID-19. Although the nationwide “social distancing” moves of the last two days — closing schools, theaters, and professional sports events — might cut into this growth, they didn’t help right away in China when even more draconian measures started in late January, noted a preliminary Harvard and Johns Hopkins analysis of intensive care bed needs in a COVID-19 outbreak.

“We’re going to see a lot more cases but I think we are taking the big steps to limit the dangers to patients,” the American Hospital Association’s Nancy Foster told BuzzFeed News. “I’m not a person who does modeling, but I’m optimistic we have taken all the steps.”

But modeling studies, as well as the current capacity of beds and equipment at US hospitals, point to grim possibilities for the US hospital system.

By the peak of the outbreak last month in Wuhan, nearly 20,000 patients were hospitalized simultaneously, with 10,000 in severe or critical condition. If a Wuhan-like outbreak were to take place in a US city, even with people isolating themselves, the study authors concluded, “hospitalization and ICU (intensive care unit) needs from COVID-19 patients alone may exceed current capacity.”

Another model from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health suggests that a “moderate” scenario for the coronavirus pandemic, akin to a 1968 flu pandemic, could lead to 1 million people in the US requiring hospitalization this year. A “severe” outbreak would hospitalize 9.6 million people.

Social distancing will be a necessity to prevent more severe scenarios.

“A little more alarm is needed,” said epidemiologist Caroline Buckee of Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health. “We need people to start taking personal responsibility for social distancing right away.”

“Staff and supplies are the biggest concern,” Tim Pfarr of the Washington State Hospital Association told BuzzFeed News. Washington is now facing the largest outbreak in the US, with 373 cases and 30 deaths, largely among residents of a nursing home in Kirkland, Washington. Hospitals in the state are modeling their coronavirus response after a 2017 Amtrak derailment that killed three people and sent 70 to the hospital, he said, expressing confidence in their readiness for a bigger outbreak.

Asked about whether the hospitals would have the capacity to accommodate the hundreds to thousands of undetected cases some models suggest are currently in the state, he said, “we have had a lot of experience with pandemics before, like H1N1, so we are building off that experience.”

There are around 6,000 hospitals nationwide, with more than 900,000 hospital beds outside of the intensive care unit (ICU), according to the AHA. That sounds like a lot, but remember: It is fewer than the millions of hospitalized cases that could occur in a pandemic resembling the 1968 flu. And people will still get the flu, have car wrecks, and deliver babies, needing some large portion of those beds.

That same “moderate” 1968 scenario would also put 200,000 patients into ICUs, while a “severe” outbreak would require 2.9 million people receive ICU care.

“As a comparison, there are about 46,500 medical ICU beds in the United States and perhaps an equal number of other ICU beds that could be used in a crisis,” the Johns Hopkins study authors, Eric Toner and Richard Waldhorn, wrote. “Even spread out over several months, the mismatch between demand and resources is clear.”

Since the most severe symptom associated with COVID-19 is the respiratory failure associated with severe pneumonia, the biggest worry aside from capacity at hospitals is about the number of ventilators, as well as the specialists who can staff them. There are an estimated 150,000 respiratory therapists in the US, and about 160,000 machines. In Washington state, a request has been made to a national stockpile of medical equipment to release more ventilators, said Pfarr. The stockpile maintains another 10,000 ventilators, which come in three varieties. A 2018 analysis reported most should function well out of the box, aside from one model that only lasted 58% as long as expected.

The shortfall between the numbers of beds, ventilators, and staff against projected numbers of cases — pitting the hundreds of thousands against the millions — explains the drumbeat of calls to help “flatten the curve” of the outbreak.

Screen Shot 2020-03-13 at 8.07.46 AM

It’s a simple idea: A tidal wave of sudden cases in just a few weeks will swamp emergency rooms, but the same number of cases spread over months will test the surge capacity of hospitals without overwhelming them. Two hundred thousand ICU cases in the “moderate” pandemic scenario hitting hospitals in the next three months would overwhelm the 46,500 ICU beds we might have available. But spread over a year, those 200,000 cases would be a difficult, but possible, strain for our hospitals to handle.

“It is impossible to predict the impact COVID-19 will have on our nation’s staffing of respiratory therapists or for how long it might last,” Thomas Kallstrom of the American Association for Respiratory Care told BuzzFeed News. “Should the need arise, hospitals would be wise to consider reaching out to recently retired respiratory therapists as a backup and, if necessary, consider enlisting students.”

If we don’t “flatten the curve,” cities with fewer hospital resources could face catastrophe.

A Wuhan-style outbreak in a US city would mean 2.1 to 4 critically ill patients per 10,000 people, depending on factors like the average age and high blood pressure status of its residents. US ICU beds average about 2.8 per 10,000 adults. Cities like Detroit, Memphis, and Louisville look potentially at high risk of critical care shortfalls by that measure, according to the preliminary ICU analysis from Harvard and Johns Hopkins.

The consequences of not flattening the curve are horrible, a switch from treating patients on a “sickest first” basis to “most likely to recover” as a basis for allocating ventilators, described in a 2011 CDC pandemic ethics publication. “After a public health emergency is declared, rules that favor the overall benefit to the population and society may have to be considered,” the CDC wrote.

In other words, triage to decide who lives and who dies, based upon the limited availability of ventilators.

More than 3,000 people have died from COVID-19 in Hubei Province, China, home to Wuhan, since the start of the year.

Widespread testing and telemedicine could help hospitals handle the outbreak.

Some hospitals have started adding parking lot tents for screening for coronavirus to increase capacity. The tents, which the American Hospital Association describes as standard parts of emergency planning, also help keep patients with dangerous illnesses separate from others, especially high-risk groups like diabetics or people with lung illnesses.

On the plus side for hospitals, AHA’s Foster added, the coronavirus appears largely transmitted through contact with droplets from coughs and sneezes, but not through the air like measles. That means that while staff have to wear protective gowns, gloves, and masks — another area of reported shortages — at least they won’t be required to prepare costly negative pressure hospital suites to handle patients, like in the 2014 Ebola outbreak. CDC guidelines do call for these rooms for people undergoing procedures that will lead to a lot of coughing by patients.

One approach to sparing hospital staff is the advent of drive-through testing for coronavirus, seen in Seattle, Denver, and Hartford, Connecticut. The “fast-food” approach’s goal is to minimize the exposure of staff to sick patients, limit the amount of protective gear exposed, and get as many people tested as possible.

Telemedicine approaches to treating patients with COVID-19 are also about to get a tryout, said Edward O’Bryan of the Medical University of South Carolina. Everyone in his state is now able to access an online portal to see about 90 specialists through phone, video, or a chatline ahead of going to the doctor’s office or an emergency room with symptoms, helping take pressure off those points.

“We’re staffing up,” said O’Bryan, who added that he has been preparing the telemedicine portal in preparation for an outbreak like this for five years. “Luckily in South Carolina, we have an emergency about once a year — it’s called a hurricane — so we have had a lot of reasons to try to get ready.”

But so far, testing in the US has been woefully inadequate.

Looming over preparations for the US outbreak is the uncertainty of the extent of the disease, driven by a shortfall in testing tied to a botched CDC public health lab test, strict and sometimes contradictory criteria for testing, and federal limits on academic and private lab tests removed only in the last two weeks. The result has been a country waking up daily to hidden blooms of cases suddenly revealed by fresh testing. With the private labs used by most doctors to perform lab tests only now entering the arena, say experts, there are still more surprises to come.

“Until we have more testing, we are really working in the dark,” said Harvard’s Buckee.

Former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb testified to Congress on Thursday that labs in the United States currently only have the capacity to process lab tests of about 17,000 patients a day. That’s fewer than the number of cases the US should have in the next 10 days under current rates of increase.

Until widespread testing is put in place and the full COVID-19 picture emerges, confusion and uncertainty will surround the outbreak, adding to the mounting fears that always accompany epidemics.

It is important that everyone have access to testing, regardless of insurance coverage or ability to pay — Rep. Porter’s point. But The Daily Beast reports that the Trump Administration Is Blocking States From Using Medicaid to Fight Coronavirus, Says Report:

During past crises such as 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, and the swine flu outbreak, both Republican and Democrat presidents have loosened Medicaid rules to help states meet urgent needs. But the Los Angeles Times reports the Trump administration is holding states back from using Medicaid to help them fight the growing coronavirus pandemic. “If they wanted to do it, they could do it,” Cindy Mann, who ran the Medicaid program in the Obama administration, reportedly said. The administration could reportedly relax rules that determine who’s eligible for coverage as well as what kind of medical services can be covered. Shortly after Katrina in 2005, President George W. Bush allowed states to grant waivers that then allowed them to rapidly enroll people into Medicaid. In 2009, during the swine flu outbreak, President Obama took similar action. Sara Rosenbaum, a Medicaid expert at George Washington University, said the Trump administration’s “ideology is clouding their response to a crisis.”

We need to start talking about the criminal negligence of the Trump administration. People are going to die because of their gross incompetence in responding to this health crisis.

Leave a Reply