VOTE NO on ALL 8 Statewide Ballot Propositions

The Pima County Democratic Party is calling on all voters to VOTE NO on all 8 ballot propositions dumped onto the ballot by the corrupt Republican-led Legislature.

Speaking at the August 25 meeting of the LD18 Democrats, Gail Kamaras identified the toxic propositions as No. 141, 142 and 144 that would amend the state constitution. Propositions No. 316, 317, 318, 319 and 320 would enact harmful state laws.

Kamaras is a precinct committee member, the lead of LD18’s Pantano Territory, and a state Democratic Party Hall of Fame inductee.

Details are at Pimavote.com. Once there, click “Jump to Propositions.”

Prop. 141 would prohibit taxing electric vehicles based on miles traveled. It would create a permanent loss of potential tax revenue, as electric vehicles do not pay fuel tax.

Prop. 142 is an anti-DEI measure. “It is what I call ideological censorship. This culture war-driven measure would block teachers from discussing accurate history, censor certain content from being taught in schools, and ban trainings on how to support LGBTQ plus staff and students,” Kamaras said.

Prop. 144 is specifically designed to kill voting by mail and to limit your voting rights. It would also force voters to resubmit proof of ID every time they vote. 

Prop. 316 limits how much cities can tax food. There are no state sales taxes on food, but some cities do tax food. Disguised as tax relief, Prop 316 was designed by the legislature to handcuff cities and towns by restricting the revenue they need for firefighters, police, libraries, parks and street maintenance.

Prop. 317 would allow the state to randomly designate “drug cartels” as terrorist organizations. That designation would give absolutely unlimited authority to the Arizona Department of Homeland Security to act against anyone it deems part of a “drug cartel.”

Prop. 318 is an anti-trans bathroom bill. “It would enshrine discrimination against a tiny group of trans girls to exclude them from all sports,” Kamaras said. It would also apply to any trans person using public facilities such as locker rooms, showers or bathrooms.

Prop. 319 is a backdoor way to defund the voter-created Clean Elections Commission. It’s labeled as a “photo radar ban,” but it’s actually designed to defund the Clean Elections Commission. Traffic fines include a mandatory 10% surcharge for the Commission, which provides public funding to candidates who agree not to take private or special interest money.

Prop. 320 limits public school funding. “It is designed to micromanage and cripple public schools, but not charter or private schools,” Kamaras said. The measure would force public schools to spend at least 60% of their funding on “direct instructional spending,” meaning teacher pay, or have the state withhold the difference.

For further details, you can read the Phoenix New Times review of all the propositions.


Discover more from Blog for Arizona

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “VOTE NO on ALL 8 Statewide Ballot Propositions”

  1. A good rule of thumb: Propositions placed on the ballot by our current legislature are not to be taken at face (or title) value and should die.

    The ease which the legislature can place propositions on the ballot but make it difficult, if not impossible, for citizen’s propositions to be placed. And then if a citizen’s proposition passes they do everything in their power to ensure it’s nullified. Way past time to kick pathetic bums to the curb.

    Reply
  2. Thanks for the reminder of the awesome PCDP voter guide? I’ll use this along with my LD17’s printed guide for tabling and more.
    Because our Rincon Valley club is “non-partisan” I looked to see what the publicans were doing – zilch. Just a repeat of the Recorder’s office info.
    Except a detailed “Vote No” on Pima Prop 425. Which I found interesting as everything they list in detail are reasons to vote YES on Prop 425! I guess the publicans of Pima County are as fed up as the rest of us.

    Reply
  3. Thanks for the great recaps, Larry. I would include in that list, for Tucson residents, Prop 421, the franchise agreement (FA). It is detrimental in so many ways. We defeated the similar proposed FA last year, only to be resurrected in 2026. It does not go by the guidance of AG Kris Mayes, who said that an FA is one of the strongest tools a city in Arizona has, to change our CO2 emissions, to transition to solar and energy efficiency. Proposition should be resoundingly defeated.

    Reply

Leave a Comment