Posted by AzBlueMeanie:
Suzy Khimm at Ezra Klein's Wonkblog has a response to the hysterical anti-immigrant nativists like Governor Jan Brewer: Want tighter border security? You’re already getting it.
Legislators have failed to pass a sweeping immigration overhaul for more
than five years. But there’s one piece of the 2007 immigration reform
bill that they’ve managed to accomplish: pouring hundreds of millions of
dollars into border security.
Under the Senate’s new blueprint
for reform, the legalization of undocumented immigrants would only
happen if the government “finally commit[s] the resources needed to
secure the border,” as well as strict visa enforcement for legal
immigrants. It’s a provision that’s similar to Bush’s 2007 immigration
bill, which also made legalization contingent on beefed-up border
The Senate’s language suggests that the government has held back from
devoting money, equipment and personnel to border security. In fact,
even though the 2007 immigration bill ultimately failed, we’ve
nevertheless hit nearly all of the targets that it established for
increased border security—except for achieving absolute “operational
control” of the border and mandatory detention of all border-crossers
who’ve been apprehended.
The 2007 bill sought to increase the number of Border Patrol agents to 20,000; in FY 2011, we hit 21,444 agents.
The 2007 bill proposed to erect 300 miles of vehicle barriers, 370 miles
of fencing, 105 radar and camera towers, and four drones; by 2012, we
completed 651 miles of vehicle fencing—including 352 miles of pedestrian fencing and 299 vehicle barriers—300 towers, and nine drones, according to Customs and Border Patrol.
The 2007 bill asked for the resources for Immigration and Customs
Enforcement to detain up to 31,500 people per day; ICE now has funding
to detain up to 34,000 individuals at any time, per FY 2012 appropriations.
Finally, the 2007 bill also called for what’s known as “operational
control” of the entire border, which the 2006 Secure Fence Act defined
as “the prevention of all unlawful entries into the United States,
including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, instruments
of terrorism, narcotics, and other contraband.”
Experts generally agree that “absolute” control of the border is
practically impossible, so DHS has instead defined “effective”
operational control as “the ability to detect, respond, and interdict
illegal activity at the border or after entry into the United States,”
as a Congressional Research Service report explains.
By that definition, the government had 57 percent of the southern
border under “effective control,” up from 31 percent in 2007, due to the
new border security measures that were implemented since then. (The
2007 bill also called for mandatory federal implementation of workplace
immigration enforcement measures like E-Verify; these have only been put
into effect by certain states.)
Such enforcement has come with a large price tag: Last year, Congress
funded Customs and Border Protection at $11.7 billion—64 percent more
than FY 2006 and $262 million more than in FY 2011, despite the new climate of austerity . And that doesn’t count the $600 million that Congress provided
in a separate border security bill in 2010. But the Obama
administration believes that it’s also paid dividends: In 2011,
apprehensions at the border were at 340,252—the lowest level since
1971—while the Obama administration has deported immigrants at a faster rate than Bush.
Pro-immigration advocates believe that all this is proof that we’ve
already done enough on the border security front. “The border security
issue is, at this point, 90 to 95 percent solved,” says Frank Sharry,
head of America’s Voice.
Of course, it will never be good enough for the absolutists who insist on zero infractions, as if that is a realistic and achievable goal. They will forever move the goalposts and demand the impossible. These absolutists, like Governor Jan Brewer, just want to keep "illegal immigration" alive as a campaign issue to beat the drums and to raise money from the GOP's nativist and racist base. Brewer promotes PAC petition in response to immigration plan:
In a Monday evening post on her Facebook page, Brewer wrote, “Arizona must have a secure border! Please sign my petition at www.janpac.com.”
The post links to Jan PAC’s website, where people can sign a petition
declaring, “Yes Governor Brewer, I will stand with you to Secure Our
Border. President Obama and the federal government has failed to do its
job so we must stand united to protect America!”
The woman is shameless, and an embarrassment to to this state and to decent people everywhere.