What Texas is doing with vote by mail borders on negligent manslaughter


The state of Texas is on the precipice of a pandemic catastrophe. On Friday, Governor Greg Abbott began backtracking from reopening the Texas economy by closing bars, dialing back restaurants to half-capacity.

In Houston, Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo issued a Level 1, or “Code Red.” Harris County raises COVID-19 threat to most critical level, residents encouraged to stay home:

Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo is asking residents to stay home and minimize all contacts with a new stay-home advisory after a surge in cases has moved the county to the highest possible COVID-19 threat level.

Level 1, or “Code Red,” signals severe and worsening outbreaks that have strained contact tracing and testing. Thursday marked the second highest single-day increase for COVID-19 cases in Texas; the statewide total is now at 135,648 cases.

Hidalgo said during a Friday press conference that the COVID-19 outbreak is leading the county toward a “catastrophic and unsustainable” situation and that it is quickly becoming a hotspot in one of the worst-hit places in the world.

Leaders of the Texas Medical Center said on Thursday that the hospital system is still in good shape, despite issuing a statement less than 24 hours before warning the public of dangerously high capacity levels. Hidalgo said hospitals have reached 100 percent of their base capacity and that relying on contingency plans is a gamble on human life.

“When did we lose our respect for human life…to the degree that we say let’s fill our ICU and surge capacity before we take any meaningful action?” Hidalgo said. “…lives are not collateral damage.”

Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo raises the question that everyone should be asking the US. Supreme Court, because on Friday the Supreme Court Turned Down a Request to Allow All Texans to Vote by Mail:

The Supreme Court said on Friday that it would not require Texas to let all eligible voters vote by mail.

The Texas Democratic Party and several voters had urged the court to reinstate a federal trial judge’s injunction requiring state officials to allow all voters, and not just those who are 65 or older, to submit their ballots by mail. They relied on the 26th Amendment, which lowered the voting age to 18 and said the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of age.”

The court’s brief order gave no reasons, which is typical when the justices rule on emergency applications, and there were no noted dissents. Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a statement saying that the question in the case raised “weighty but seemingly novel questions regarding the 26th Amendment.”

But she said the court was right not to address those questions in the context of an emergency application. “I hope,” she wrote, “that the court of appeals will consider the merits of the legal issues in this case well in advance of the November election.”

Voting by mail has been the focus of debate and litigation in light of the coronavirus pandemic. Five states will conduct the general election in November entirely by mail, and many others will allow all eligible voters to vote by mail.

Texas, on the other hand, generally requires voters to appear in person, but it makes exceptions for those away from home or in jail, those with disabilities and those who are 65 or older.

In May, Judge Fred Biery, of the Federal District Court in San Antonio, ruled that “any eligible Texas voter who seeks to vote by mail in order to avoid transmission of Covid-19 can apply for, receive and cast an absentee ballot in upcoming elections during the pendency of pandemic circumstances.”

This was entirely appropriate given the pandemic catastrophe occurring in Texas right at this moment.

But the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in New Orleans, blocked the injunction while an appeal moves forward, saying Judge Biery’s ruling “will be remembered more for audacity than legal reasoning.”

No, the Fifth Circuit, populated by conservative activist judges who frequently engage in partisan politics from the bench, will be condemned by history for their indifference to human life.

In a concurring opinion, Judge James C. Ho wrote that the 26th Amendment tracks the language of the 15th Amendment, which forbids discrimination in voting “on account of race,” adding that “it would presumably run afoul of the Constitution to allow only voters of a particular race to vote by mail.”

Still, Judge Ho wrote, even if the same reasoning applied to age discrimination in voting, it was not clear what the court should do about the Texas law. “Do we ‘level up’ (everyone gets to vote by mail) or ‘level down’ (no one gets to)?” he asked.

Since the answer was unclear, he wrote, a stay of Judge Biery’s injunction was warranted.

The plaintiffs sought emergency relief in the Supreme Court, saying that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling “forces millions of Texas voters to either risk their health at the polls, twice, or relinquish their right to vote in the upcoming election season.”

The state’s primary runoff election, which was postponed in light of the pandemic, is scheduled to be held on July 14. Judge Biery’s ruling also applied to the general election in November.

Other constitutional amendments, lawyers for the plaintiffs wrote, used nearly identical language to bar discrimination in voting based on race, sex and the failure to pay a poll tax. “A state would plainly violate those amendments if it offered no-excuse mail voting only to whites, only to men or only to voters who pay a tax,” they wrote.

“If granting the right to cast mail-in ballots on the basis of race violates the 15th Amendment — and of course it does — then it follows inescapably that granting that right on the basis of age violates the 26th,” they wrote.

In response, Ken Paxton, Texas’ attorney general, told the justices that “there is no constitutional right to vote by mail.”

“So long as a state has permitted voting through other means, which Texas has,” Mr. Paxton wrote, “the right to vote is not implicated.”

Even assuming that discrimination based on age violates the 26th Amendment, Mr. Paxton wrote, the solution would be to bar older people from voting by mail rather than allowing younger people to do so.

Just for the record, Ken Paxton is one of the worst human beings alive. He is also the lead attorney for the Republican Attorneys General, including Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, who are seeking to overturn the Affordable Care Act aka “Obamacare” at the height of the coronavirus pandemic, which would take health care away from upwards of 20 million Americans. There should be a special place in hell for this evil man.

Texas has long ranked last in voter participation in elections due to systematic voter suppression that prevents its citizens from voting. That began to change recently with the efforts of Rep. Beto O’Rourke to register and to turn out voters in his near-miss Senate campaign. Republicans know that their only path to holding onto power in Texas is through systematic voter suppression.

So Texas Republicans vehemently oppose making voting easy for everyone with no excuse vote-by-mail balloting — a right that every Arizonan has enjoyed for years, 80% of Arizona voters already receive their ballots in the mail — and they are willing to knowingly risk the lives of voters and poll workers by forcing them to vote in person during a raging pandemic. This borders on negligent manslaughter.

This should backfire on Republicans. My attitude would be that if you are going to force me to risk my life to exercise my right to vote, you can be damn sure that I am going to vote every Republican out of office up and down the ballot. It is time to end this Republican tyranny in Texas.

Leave a Reply