Featured Stories
Does anyone trust Ally Miller?
September 1, 2012
by
by David Safier I already posted about the bizarre scene on Thursday's Bill Buckmaster show (Mark Evans hosting) where Ally Miller denied being a Tea Partier, calling such allegations "horrible stories" and "name calling." She has her own page on the Tea Party Patriots' website, for God's sake! It looks like distrust concerning things Ally … Read more
More about Pedicone’s new contract at TUSD
September 1, 2012
by
by David Safier Kudos to Luke Knipe for giving the details behind the details of Pedicone's new TUSD contract on his pocobravo blog. For me, Knipe's revelations fall into the "I didn't know that" category, even after reading the Star article on the contract. For instance, giving away his $35,000 bonus was a nice thing, … Read more
The Mirage They Sell
August 31, 2012
by
Posted by Bob Lord Throughout the RNC, we heard how someone "built that," woven into references to the American Dream. Marco Rubio talked about how his father tended bar in the back of the room so he son could one day stand at the podium in the front of the room. Was it moving? Of … Read more
Maricopa County Superior Court orders ‘Top Two Primary’ back onto ballot
August 31, 2012
Posted by AzBlueMeanie:
The Arizona Capitol Times (subscription required) reports, Court says “Top Two” should be on November ballot:
A Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled today that an initiative to overhaul the state’s primary system has enough valid signatures to go on the November ballot.
Judge John Rea found that 577 signatures earlier disqualified by the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office were actually valid.
The “Top Two’’ initiative had been disqualified by the Secretary of State’s Office because of a lack of valid signatures.
Proponents of the measure, known officially as the “Open Elections/Open Government Act,” tracked down many of the people who had signed the petitions and demonstrated that their signatures were legitimate.
That changed the invalidity rate in a sample that had been used to reject the initiative. As a result, Rea concluded that the initiative actually exceeded the number of required valid signatures to put the initiative on the ballot by more than 6,000.
* * *
Rea also ordered election officials to include the initiative in the publicity pamphlet for the November ballot, which describes proposals to be decided in the general election.
He said advocates for the “Open Elections/Open Government Act” persuasively demonstrated that the 577 signatures disqualified by the Maricopa County Recorder were valid.
* * *
In his ruling, Rea noted that some signatures were disqualified because of an invalid date: They did not contain month, date and year.
“However, the statute directs the recorder to disqualify a signature if ‘no date of signing is provided’,” Rea said. “From context and other clues, the Plaintiffs showed persuasively that the disqualified signatures were made on the appropriate dates.”
Romney speech ignores our service men and women, veterans, and the war in Afghanistan
August 31, 2012
Posted by AzBlueMeanie:
Here is a transcript of the RNC Convention acceptance speech by Willard "Mittens" Romney. Transcript: Mitt Romney's Acceptance Speech.
Go ahead, word search his speech for "troops," "service," "veterans," "Afghanistan." I'll wait.
In his acceptance speech, Willard "Mittens" Romney never mentioned the war in Afghanistan, never acknowledged the service of men and women serving their country in the U.S. Armed Forces, nor our veterans. Not once. Romney mentioned the "military" only once, but in reference to sequestration budget cuts.
If a Democrat did this, there would have been an instantaneous firestorm of howling criticism from the mighty Wurlitzer of the right-wing noise machine. This slight to our Armed Forces and veterans went largely unnoticed by the media villagers and Beltway bloviators in their post-speech commentary.
As Steve Benen notes today in An invisible war:
I think we know what would happen under such a scenario. McCain,
Kristol, Krauthammer, Limbaugh, Cheney, et al, would reach an
unavoidable conclusion: there's simply no way this Democrat has a
credible claim to be Commander in Chief during a time of war.
* * *
When was the last time there was a major-party nominating convention held during a war in which the presidential candidate decided not to mention the conflict or those fighting on our behalf? Has this ever happened?
For that matter, can anyone say with confidence what Romney's position on the war is? Or how he intends to execute this war if he's president in five months?
Are McCain, Kristol, Krauthammer, Limbaugh, Cheney, et al, on board with this?
[Note: Bloody Bill Kristol was not pleased with Romney's failure to mention the troops, veterans, or Afghanistan.]
* * *
If Romney takes the oath of office in January, he'll have tens of thousands of American troops on the ground in Afghanistan. Does anyone have the foggiest idea what he intends to do with those troops and/or how long he intends to keep them there? Does he?
GOP War on Voting: U.S. District Court Judge restores early voting in Ohio
August 31, 2012
Posted by AzBlueMeanie: In yet another major victory for voting rights advocates this week, a federal judge today sided with President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign in Obama for America v. Husted and ordered Ohio to allow early voting on the three days prior to the Nov. 6 election to all voters. Federal judge orders Ohio … Read more
Fact Checking the mendacity of ‘Mittens’
August 31, 2012
Posted by AzBlueMeanie:
Time once again for Steve Benen's weekly fact check of the shameless shapeshifter and pathological liar, Willard "Mittens" Romney. Chronicling Mitt's Mendacity, Vol. XXXII:
Jon Chait noted
the other day that Mitt Romney "has built his entire campaign on, well,
lies." Jon made the observation in passing, but it struck me as
significant, especially as the Republican National Convention unfolded
— Romney isn't the first national politician to try to deceive the
public, but he's arguably the first to build his entire campaign around
the deceptions.
Kevin Drum was thinking along the same lines responding to Romney's lie on welfare policy, which the candidate has vowed to continue repeating, even after it's been proven false.
In the past, you felt that maybe campaigns were at least a little bit embarrassed about this kind of thing. They'd blame it on someone else. They'd try to produce some lame defense. They'd haul out some fake white paper to give themselves cover. They'd do something. The Romney campaign just doesn't seem to care. If it works, they use it. It's like the campaign is being run by cyborgs.
Thomas Mann, a longtime political scholar at the center-left Brookings Institution and a respected Beltway voice, added, "The Romney campaign has, as is strikingly evident at the Tampa convention, broken new ground in its brazen and cynical disregard for the truth."
Love Romney or hate him, it's an experiment of sorts — we're seeing the first real-world test of a post-truth campaign. Team Romney lies, without shame, because it's certain the line between fact and fiction has been blurred out of existence, and if lies will give Romney vast power, the ends justify the means.
But for those who still like to think reality has some meaning, I hope they'll take some time to consider the 32nd installment of my weekly series, chronicling Mitt's mendacity. (For the record, this week, I'm only including falsehoods from Romney himself. Including every lie told at the convention would have caused a mendacity overdose.)
1. In Romney's acceptance speech last night, he said, "Four years ago, I know that many Americans felt a fresh excitement about the possibilities of a new president. That president was not the choice of our party but Americans always come together after elections."
Actually, congressional Republicans decided early on that they would refuse to come together and work with President Obama, no matter what he offered in terms of policies. This began before Inauguration Day, when GOP leaders decided they simply would not cooperate or compromise with Democrats.
2. Romney added that Obama "took office without the basic qualification that most Americans have and one that was essential to his task. He had almost no experience working in a business."
First, the president has experience working in business. Second, lots of successful presidents didn't come from the private sector (and lots of lousy presidents were businessmen). And third, it's obvious that Romney doesn't believe his own rhetoric, because if he did, he wouldn't have picked Paul Ryan as his running mate — Ryan has far less private-sector experience than Obama.
Team Romney fails at convention management
August 31, 2012
Posted by AzBlueMeanie: Modern day conventions are heavily scripted affairs for TV. Every speech is vetted by the campaign and are rehearsed in advance. Nothing occurs at the convention in front of the cameras that has not been previously approved by the campaign. Nothing. The RNC spent the first three days of the convention keeping … Read more
