Last month, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sitting en banc struck down Proposition 100 (2006), which amended the Arizona Constitution to deny bond to undocumented immigrants charged with “serious” crimes. The case is Angel Lopez-Valenzuela v. Joe Arpaio, (No. 11-16487). You can read the Opinion Here (.pdf).
The en banc Court reversed a three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit upholding the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Prop. 100 “violates the substantive component of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.”
On Friday, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy temporarily blocked implementation of the ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Kennedy gave no reason for his order. Reversal of Arizona’s immigrant no-bail law blocked:
Friday’s order is at least an interim victory for Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery who has been defending the law.
He contends there are legitimate reasons to conclude that those accused of certain serious crimes who are in the country illegally are less likely to show up for trial. And Montgomery said the 9th Circuit got it wrong in concluding such a blanket rule is unconstitutional.
But the stay may be brief. Kennedy gave the American Civil Liberties Union, which is challenging the law, until the end of the day Monday to convince him and his colleagues that the high court should stay out of the fight.

