U.S. District Court for Wisconsin strikes down state’s same-sex marriage ban

The dominoes continue to fall . . . today a U.S. District Court Judge in Wisconsin struck down that state’s same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional. The Wisconsin State Journal reports, Wisconsin’s same-sex marriage ban struck down:

EqualA federal judge has struck down Wisconsin’s same-sex marriage ban, the latest in a sweeping number of such rulings this year.

“Quite simply, this case is about liberty and equality, the two cornerstones of the rights protected by the United States Constitution,” U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb wrote in her Friday ruling.

Read the Ruling Here (.pdf).

The ruling does not mean that same-sex couples will immediately be able to marry. In her order, Crabb gave the plaintiffs until June 16 to submit a proposed injunction describing “in reasonable detail … the act or acts restrained or required.” She wrote that the plaintiffs should identify what they want each named defendant to do or to be enjoined from doing.

She gave the state a week after that to file a response in opposition, and if they do, the plaintiffs will have a week to reply.

Crabb wrote that she would address the state’s pending motion to stay the injunction until after materials on the proposed injunction are filed. She wrote that both sides could supplement what they’ve already submitted on the motion.

Read more

SCOTUS will not block same-sex marriage in Oregon

Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog reports, Court won’t block Oregon same-sex marriages :

EqualThe Supreme Court, in a one-sentence order without explanation, refused on Wednesday afternoon (.pdf)  to stop same-sex marriages in Oregon.  The denial was by the full Court, after Justice Anthony M. Kennedy had submitted the plea to it.

The request had come from a private group that is strongly opposed to same-sex marriage, the National Organization for Marriage.  It had been barred from taking part in the case over the constitutionality of an Oregon ban, and it had asked the Justices to put off a judge’s decision striking down that ban.  It has an appeal on file at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and wanted the federal judge’s decision put off until that appeal was decided.

In January, the Court had put on hold a different federal judge’s order striking down Utah’s same-sex marriage ban.  In that case, state officials had sought a delay. Although other federal judges have struck down similar bans elsewhere, in all of those cases the rulings have been put on hold — when that was requested by state officials — while appeals went forward.

Read more

The right-wing attack on Bowie Bergdahi is a microcosm of the coming fight over closing the prison camp at Guantanomo Bay

The warrior ethos of the U.S. military is that you never leave anyone behind—whether injured, captured, or killed.

“The United States has always had a pretty sacred rule, and that is: We don’t leave our men or women in uniform behind. Regardless of circumstances, whatever those circumstances may turn out to be, we still get an American prisoner back. Period. Full stop. We don’t condition that.” — President Barack Obama.

This credo has never been questioned — until now — by the Chickenhawk cowards of the conservative media entertainment complex, nearly all of whom never served in the U.S. military, but who were bellicose cheerleaders for the Neoconservative’s unnecessary and illegal war in Iraq, and Dick “six deferments” Cheney’s perpetual “war on terror” (terrorism is a tactic, fool, not an enemy). Critics Are Questioning American Military Credo of Leaving No One Behind.

Chickenhawks

Read more

9th Circuit Court of Appeals strikes down Arizona abortion restriction

Cathi Herrod and her Christian Taliban at the Center for Arizona Policy (CAP), and her willing accomplices in our lawless Tea-Publican legislature, suffered another defeat today when the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the Arizona law which restricts the use of abortion-inducing medications Court to continue blocking Ariz. abortion law:

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against an Arizona law that restricted the use of abortion-inducing medications.

Read the opinion Here (.pdf).

Nearly half of all abortions performed in Arizona use the medication, as opposed to surgical abortions. The medication is used during the first nine weeks of pregnancy, while surgical abortions are performed later.

Read more

(Update) Ain’t nobody takin’ a dive! Rotellini deserves her rematch

The Arizona Republic reports today that nine GOP state legislators who are afraid that the poster boy for political corruption in Arizona, Tom “banned for life by the SEC” Horne, is a drag on the GOP ticket have asked him to withdraw from the AG race.  Ariz. GOP lawmakers call on Horne to withdraw from race (paragraphs have been reordered for clarity):

TomHorneNine Republican state lawmakers delivered a letter to Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne on Thursday afternoon, urging him to end his re-election bid.

The one-page letter expresses “grave concerns” over recent allegations by a former Horne staffer, who asserts that the attorney general and his executive staff, among other things, ran a quasi campaign office out of the Attorney General’s Office.

“We acknowledge the investigations into wrongdoing are not complete, but that in no way lessens the dark cloud of impropriety that hangs over you and your administration,” the letter states. “We trust that the authorities conducing these investigations will enforce the law to the best of their abilities. We also acknowledge this process will take time and that you have a right to your day in court. Your ability to lead and serve the public, however, has already been severely compromised.”

Thursday’s letter was signed by state Reps. Paul Boyer, Rick Gray, Warren Petersen, Karen Fann, J.D. Mesnard, T.J. Shope, and state Sens. Kelli Ward — who had endorsed Horne — Nancy Barto and Steve Yarbrough.

Read more