Corporate Democrats Should Not Be Rewarded For Their Bad Faith Obstruction

Permanent musical accompaniment, A Matter of Trust, by Billy Joel (1986).

Amanda Marcotte is exactly right: Centrist Dems broke a promise on infrastructure. They should not get their “bipartisan” victory now:

Advertisement

When the two-track plan to pass President Joe Biden’s ambitious jobs and infrastructure program first emerged, many progressives understandably thought it was a trap.

The bipartisan group of Senate negotiators speak to reporters just after a vote to start work on a nearly $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package, at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, July 28, 2021. From left are Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

To summarize an impossibly complex situation: Earlier this year, Biden proposed a giant bill that would contain huge chunks of the progressive agenda. Some of it was GOP-friendly, such as building roads and bridges. Some of it — childcare funding, policies to reduce climate change, and health care expansions — was not. But centrist Democrats refused to vote for the entire bill through budget reconciliation, which only requires a party-line vote, because they wanted to say they were “bipartisan.” So a scheme was concocted: Put the GOP-friendly items in one bill that could pass on a bipartisan basis, and put the rest in a bill to pass on a party-line vote.

So Democrats concocted an intra-party deal: Progressives vote for the moderate-pleasing bill, and, in exchange, moderates vote for the progressive bill.

“The moderates couldn’t pass a bipartisan bill without the more progressive wing of our caucus,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told Politico in August. “And the progressives couldn’t get a big, bold bill without the moderates.”

Some progressives, however, smelled a rat. They feared it was scheme concocted by Republicans and centrist Democrats to carve out the most important and most popular parts of Biden’s agenda and put it in a separate bill that would be easier to drown in a bathtub. But no, progressives were told, there was no intention of doing any of that! As assurance, progressives were promised that both bills would be passed at once, so no one would be tempted to renege on the deal.

Turns out progressives were right to be paranoid. Centrist Democrats, led by — who else? — Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, are, to be blunt, reneging on their end of the bargain. They are demanding that the skinnier bipartisan bill be passed first. While they keep claiming they’ll vote for the more ambitious bill — after slicing and dicing it to be less ambitious, naturallythere is no reason to believe them. They are, after all, people who break promises. The wise thing to assume at this point is that they are trying to trick progressives into holding up their end of the bargain, at which point, centrists will drop any pretense of playing ball and abandon the most important parts of the Biden agenda.

“During a private meeting with the president, Sinema made clear she’s still not on board with the party’s $3.5 trillion social spending plan and is hesitant to engage on some specifics until the bipartisan infrastructure package passes the House, according to a person who spoke with her,” Politico reported Wednesday morning, confirming not just that Sinema is a snake in the grass, but also not half as clever at hiding her schemes as she thinks she is.

As a business lobbyist admitted to Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo, “their optimal scenario is that the infrastructure bill passes and the reconciliation bill goes down to defeat entirely.”

Progressives shouldn’t let them get away with this. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has already delayed a vote on the skinny bill from Monday to Thursday, clearly in hopes that the centrists will stop reneging and the deal can be salvaged. But if centrists haven’t backed down from their unsubtle efforts to derail the Biden agenda, then it’s time for progressives to make good on the “F around and find out” threat. Progressives should refuse to vote for the skinny bill, and stand by their demand that it’s both bills or none.

There are many Democrats who are panicked at this proposition, fearing that the slim infrastructure bill is better than passing nothing. But while that is a legitimate concern, it pales next to the larger problem of rewarding saboteurs and letting the GOP continue to use a handful of centrists as puppets to control the Democratic agenda. It really comes down to the very basic principles of contracts: If bad faith actors are allowed to renege on deals, they will continue to use false promises to entrap the good faith actors time and again.

The good news, as Joan Walsh of The Nation pointed out on MSNBC on Tuesday night, is the presence of “a couple dozen progressives who are saying they will not vote for this infrastructure bill if it’s not tied in some way to a future, larger, more generous, robust, necessary reconciliation bill.”

The progressive caucus reiterated their intention publicly to vote down the bipartisan bill unless centrists hold up their end of the bargain. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont backed them up on Twitter, noting that “If the bipartisan infrastructure bill is passed on its own on Thursday, this will be in violation of an agreement,” and “it will end all leverage that we have to pass a major reconciliation bill.”

As Sanders noted, this isn’t just about keeping everyone in the Democratic caucus honest, but about substantive political concerns. The skinny bill makes “no serious effort to address the long-neglected crises facing the working families of our country, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he argued, adding that it also doesn’t address “the existential threat to our country and planet with regard to climate change.”

From a moral point of view, the last point is by far the most important. As former Barack Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer noted in his most recent newsletter, the progressive bill “is our best, and perhaps last, chance to do something meaningful about climate change before it is too late.” As another former Obama aide, John Podesta, warned the Democratic caucus in a memo, “There is no time. There is no next time.” 

Plus, if they can force centrists to pony up the promised votes, progressives may be saving moderate Democrats from themselves. Rep. Katie Porter of California made this point eloquently in an interview with the Washington Post, noting that the items in the bigger bill “will immediately begin to improve the lives of Americans and will begin to immediately improve our economy.” Basically, all good stuff that Democrats can campaign on for the midterms. The smaller bill, on the other hand, is mostly focused on long-range infrastructure projects that will not be noticed by the voters that Democrats need to win in 2022.

Voting down the bill risks, of course, getting nothing done at all. That would be a shame. But it is better than the alternative, which is rewarding these childish and lobbyist-driven antics by a handful of Democrats. Appealing to their higher angels — or to the fate of the planet — clearly isn’t moving people like Manchin and Sinema, who care more about being flattered by right wing fundraisers than they do the future of humanity. The moral of 2021, in many ways, is that some folks simply can’t do the right thing unless they face consequences for doing the wrong thing. Threats only work if you make good on them. Progressives have to show they’re serious, or this small minority of bad actors will never lose control of the Democratic agenda.

There are 5-9 “centrist” (corporate) Democrats in the House emboldened by the intransigence of the “Terrible Two,” prima donna divas Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema. Their “precious” bipartisan Senate infrastructure bill cannot pass the House if the Progressive Caucus hangs together (Republicans are also whipping against the bipartisan Senate infrastructure bill, demonstrating their bad faith as well).

The bad faith of Seditious Republicans and their enabler “centrist” (corporate) Democrats should not be rewarded for their obstruction. These corporate Democrat Republican enablers don’t get their “skinny” infrastructure bill until 96% of the Democratic Caucus gets the budget reconciliation plan that Democrats have been putting together for years (for some, it has been their life’s work). This has always been the bargain all along. These bad faith Democrats do not get to renege on this bargain, and damage not just the Democratic Party, but the American people who have been counting on these popular bills to pass.

It will be Seditious Republicans and these bad faith Democratic “centrists” (corporate) Democrats who will be held accountable for any failure.

They must realize that “failure is not an option.” Both bills must be approved together by Democrats ASAP. End this ridiculous obstruction, and do your damn job!





Advertisement

Discover more from Blog for Arizona

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

5 thoughts on “Corporate Democrats Should Not Be Rewarded For Their Bad Faith Obstruction”

  1. Good rebuttal to my off the cuff spitballing, had second thoughts immediately after commenting. Really don’t know what to do with them. I don’t condone violence but at this point I would love to see Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Duckworth & others slap them silly. They certainly need something!

  2. “Perhaps the best way forward is to accept the reduction to $1.5 trillion…”

    WB, that’s just over 40% of the already compromised 3.5 trillion. It would be a huge risk given that 52 Democratic Senators and control of the House in 2022 is going to require something short of a miracle under any circumstances.

    Coming up that short would require a painful re-evaluation of priorities. Who gets cut? Children? The elderly? Community colleges? Planet Earth?

    I realize that tangling with the likes of Manchin and Sinema is risky as well, and no one seems to know what to do with Sinema.

    But I think what it comes down to, quite literally, is appeasing an enemy. They have aligned themselves with the opposition and they are, in fact, enemies of the Democratic party. They are not people who think a little differently, they are a couple of no good, power grabbing grifters. If they win this time, they just get worse.

  3. Perhaps the best way forward is to accept the reduction to $1.5 trillion, accelerate implementation, run next year on the benefits even a pared down bill has accomplished & if our Senate majority is expanded to at least 52 then pass the original $6.1 (- the two reductions). That assumes Senators Pestilence & Pest are acting in good faith & we all know about assumptions.

  4. All the ass-kissing by his colleagues of Joe Manchin, and this is what it gets us? The Hill reports that his “top-line” number is only about one-third of the already compromises $3.5 trillion package (down from the original $6.1 trillion proposal).

    “Manchin says his spending limit is $1.5 trillion”, https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/574715-manchin-says-his-spending-limit-is-15-trillion

    Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) announced Thursday that his top-line spending number for the budget reconciliation package is $1.5 trillion, far below the $3.5 trillion spending goal set by the budget resolution that he and every other Senate Democrat voted for last month.

    “My top-line has been $1.5 [trillion],” he said, explaining that he doesn’t want “to change our whole society to an entitlement mentality.”

    [Reminder: He and his son receive federal subsidies for their coal companies, and he wants to talk about entitlements? The reporting doesn’t address it, but you can bet that what he wants to cut out of this package is everything to do with clean energy and climate remediation to deal with the climate emergency.]

    Manchin said he only agreed to vote for the budget resolution with the $3.5 trillion spending target because he didn’t want to be “a fly in the ointment.” [Bad faith bullshit.]

    Wait, he’s not done being a raging asshole.

    Manchin told the right-wing National Review that ” Reconciliation Is ‘Dead on Arrival’ If It Doesn’t Include Hyde Amendment”, https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/manchin-reconciliation-dead-on-arrival-if-it-doesnt-include-hyde-amendment/

    House Democrats have pushed forward in their reconciliation bill with creating a new “Medicaid-like” program that lacks the Hyde amendment, a measure that generally prohibits federal funding of abortion. But West Virginia senator Joe Manchin, a pro-life Democrat, says reconciliation is “dead on arrival” in the Senate if it doesn’t include the longstanding pro-life protection.

    Outside of the U.S. Capitol building on Wednesday evening, Manchin briefly spoke to National Review:

    National Review: Senator, you’ve been very firm on keeping the Hyde amendment on the appropriations bills. Are you concerned about that issue at all in reconciliation—

    Manchin: Certainly—

    NR: —with this new Medicaid program?

    Manchin: Yeah, we’re not taking the Hyde amendment off. Hyde’s going to be on.

    National Review: In the new Medicaid program?

    Manchin: It has to be. It has to be. That’s dead on arrival if that’s gone.

    So Manchin is willing to blow up the most transformative social program since LBJ’s Great Society over the backwards Hyde Amendment? How is this good faith, media villagers?

  5. The bottom line is that the wealthiest Americans and corporations are going to have to pay their fair share of taxes. And Big Pharma is going to have to sell prescription drugs for less so that people can afford them.

    The progressive policies put forth in the reconciliation bill are long, long overdue. And yes, there are Democrats and progressives who have worked on this for years and for some it is their life’s work. We have this rare opportunity to finally legislate progressive policies because voting rights warriors in the state of Georgia sent Jon Ossoff and Rev. Warnock to the Senate.

    THIS is the moment. This will have to get done now. Hoping for 52 Democratic senators in 2022 AND Democratic control of the House is such a long shot it’s not worth thinking about.

    Sinema and Manchin are Republican allies. Reconciliation is DOA if they prevail. Their donors are against it, so they are too.

Comments are closed.