Guest post: Put Your Muzzle Where Your Mouth Is

Muzzle_of_the_40.6_cm_gun

Put Your Muzzle Where Your Mouth Is

By Jeremy M. Helfgot

To America’s staunch supporters of gun rights:

Over the past several years, we’ve engaged in an ongoing dialogue regarding the interpretation and merits of the Second Amendment, and how it is currently applied.

And over and over, you have collectively expressed the same repeated argument: We need to have our firearms to protect ourselves in case the government ever becomes tyrannical and turns on us, creating a police state against which we must defend ourselves and our fellow citizens.

Nonsense.

Maybe you haven’t been paying attention, but over the past ten days there have been repeated instances of well-documented police tyranny right in the American heartland. Not in New York or Miami or Chicago or L.A., but in Missouri. That’s right, Missouri.

We’ve seen police roll through an American town in tanks, turn on peaceful crowds, deploy tear gas, rubber bullets and other force, unprovoked; We’ve watched them unilaterally suspend the First Amendment, forcibly stop journalists from documenting events, and even arrest credentialed journalists who were there exercising their Constitutional rights.

And let’s not forget that this all began with an unarmed youth being shot and killed – quite possibly in cold blood – by an on-duty police officer, followed by his agency repeatedly refusing to share with the public vital information that the public has a right to know.

So where were all of you, the mighty Bill of Rights defenders who must keep a cache of firearms to rise up and protect against this kind of tyranny?

Where were all of the photos of Open Carry members packing up their long weapons and heading to Ferguson to face down the tyranny in our midst? Where were all the bedroom warriors, who should have been on the streets of Missouri defending the freedom of American citizens against this oppressive government action?

Why didn’t we see masses of ordinary citizens rising up to defend their Second Amendment rights in the face of an actual threat to those rights?

Apparently, when it comes to mustering the courage to act on your convictions, you’re all shooting blanks.

Sure, you’re tough, real big shots walking into your local Chipotle Grill or Target store with your AR-15 slung over your shoulder; it takes a real Rambo to shop for sundries and eat fast food. But when it came down to a real conflict – the kind that you’re always professing to be worried about – all of a sudden, there was nothing from you except silence.

I believe in your right to protest. I believe in your right to express yourself under the law. And I even believe in your right to carry your arms openly, where the law permits.

What I do not believe is that you are genuinely concerned about defending your rights or anyone else’s.

If you were, you would have been standing in front of the protesters in Ferguson, rifle at the ready, staring down the oppressive police force threatening their rights.

Alas, you were not.

As a group, you frequently like to tout that if you don’t exercise your Second Amendment rights, then you’ll lose them.

In this moment, you have made clear to your peers, to our country, and to the world, that by your very own logic, your rights should be forfeit.

If you do not take up your arms to actively defend the convictions you tout, they are no longer tools for defending rights or preserving democracy. They are simply toys for which you have a fetish.

Playtime is over. And the Constitution affords you no right to bear toys.

Jeremy M. Helfgot is the Principal of J.M. Helfgot Communications

3 responses to “Guest post: Put Your Muzzle Where Your Mouth Is

  1. The Bill of Rights is a collection of rights held for the individual citizen. Why would you say that the 2nd Amendment is different and does not guarantee the right of an individual to “to keep and bear arms”?

  2. Steve Hedrick

    Ferguson, Missouri is an example of police using tear gas and armored vehicles in a stupid manner against protestors who had the high ground but allowed themselves to become nothing more than thugs looting and shooting one another. If a tiny ignorant police force struts about wearing military garb and waving automatic weapons in the air, they hardly constitute a threat to the Constitution.

  3. captain*arizona

    The sultan gun law was the first gun law. It was aimed at black returning civil war veterans. Ronald reagan signed california’s first gun law it was aimed at black people trying to protect other black people from police violence. the problem in ferguson mo. is not black people with to many guns. the corporate state is for gun control for black people.