The verdict in the killing of Trayvon Martin: Some people doubling down, AZ Edition

By Craig McDermott, cross-posted from Random Musings

 

After Saturday night's acquittal of George Zimmerman on charges
stemming from his killing of Trayvon Martin, reaction was swift across
the country, including in Arizona.

State Sen. Steve Gallardo tweeted this in the aftermath of the announcement of the verdict –

And this –

Or former State Sen. David Schapira –

Sadly, other Arizona "leaders" aren't quite as thoughtful.

State Sen. Kelli Ward –

To Sen. Ward:  First, it was a "killing", not an "incident".  Second, truly, not every incident (read "conflict" in this context)
between people of different races is a civil rights violation.  Two
people arguing over a single parking spot at the local mall, perhaps
accompanied by raised voices, mutual flipping of birds, and hurt
feelings is probably not a civil rights violation.

The
stalking and execution of an unarmed black teen by a white man, the
tanking of the investigation and prosecution by white-dominated law
enforcement agencies and an acquittal by a mostly (all?) white jury?  Probably a civil rights violation or two here (file this under "If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck…").

Or State Rep. Kelly Townsend, putting a partisan political spin on things - 

To
Rep. Townsend:  I don't know Mr. Zimmerman's ethnic background or
political leanings, but even accepting your statement as fact, the
response is the same – "So what?".

I don't know every
Democrat or Hispanic in the state or country, but I can state
unequivocally that none of the Democrats, Hispanics, or Hispanic
Democrats that I know feel that partisan affiliation or ethnic
background confers an immunity from responsibility for violent acts.

Unlike, say, someone we both know (but I'm guessing that you know him better than I do).

Note to readers: Townsend got into a bit of a Twitter discussion with Steve Muratore, publisher of the Arizona Eagletarian.  I don't think she helped her cause with her follow ups, not at all, but you be the judge –

 

Some of the pearls of wisdom were indirect, repostings of something others wrote and promulgated by AZ types.

For instance, Rep. David Livingston retweeted this one –

It
seems that Rep. Livingston believes that it is unprofessional behavior
for prosecutors to look into killings of unarmed teens.  As opposed to
what the rest of society believes.  You know, that it is part of
prosecutors' jobs.

It's not just the electeds, either. 

For instance, Constantin Querard, noted political hatchet-man "consultant" here in AZ offered up this gem –

Actually, "not guilty" means "the prosecution didn't prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt".  Nothing less, nothing more.

Or Shane Wikfors, another noted political hatchet-man "consultant" here in AZ, serving up this retweet –

Don't know if he's trying to continue the stereotyping and smearing of Martin (falsely
equating Martin's killing to being equivalent to "just another
gang-related killing" and hence not something to worry about
),
criticizing liberals for not "fixing" every social problem, saying
Martin's killing is OK because other black teens have died, or if he's
maybe multitasking (don't want to insult Wikfors by implying that he can spew only one line of BS at a time). 

Any way you cut it though, from Ward's ignorance through to Wikfors' stereotyping, it's despicable.

 

 

One response to “The verdict in the killing of Trayvon Martin: Some people doubling down, AZ Edition

  1. Empathy: the intellectual identification with or vicariously experiencing of the feelings, thoughts, or attitudes of another.

    Their lack of empathy exposes the face of racism in the 21st century. And they feel no shame for voicing it.