(Update) New Jersey Court rules in favor of marriage equality

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

EqualJudge Mary Jacobson, who last month ordered the state
to allow same sex marriages because she said gay couples are being
denied equal rights "every day," Thursday wrote that delaying the start
date would prolong "violations of their constitutional rights." Christie to appeal judge's ruling allowing same-sex marriage:

[Judge Mary Jacobson] refused to delay the Oct. 21 start date she set to begin same-sex
marriages in New Jersey, rejecting the Christie administration’s
contention that no gay weddings should be peformed while the case is
still being fought in the courts.

* * *

It’s possible the Oct. 21 start date could still be put on hold. The
Christie administration quickly responded Thursday by requesting the
state Appellate Division grant the delay instead. The appeals court
could consider the motion as soon as next week, according to filing
deadlines it set for both sides to make their case.

Gay rights advocates applauded Jacobson’s decision.

Book Review: With Liberty and Justice For Some

Posted by Bob Lord I just finished Glenn Greenwald’s With Liberty and Justice For Some. I was a bit late to the party on this one – the book has been out for a few years. But it seemed like a timely read anyhow, given Greenwald's current notoriety. And well worth it. After reading his … Read more

Time to build the Grand Alliance

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

Last week i suggested "It is time for a Grand Alliance between Democrats, establishment
Republicans, and centrist moderates in a united front" against the far-right radical extremist elements of the Tea Party.

Today I read that the GOP establishment business community shares this view. The New York Times reports today, Business Groups See Loss of Sway Over House G.O.P.:

As
the government shutdown grinds toward a potential debt default, some of
the country’s most influential business executives have come to a
conclusion all but unthinkable a few years ago: Their voices are
carrying little weight with the House majority that their millions of
dollars in campaign contributions helped build and sustain.

Their
frustration has grown so intense in recent days that several trade
association officials warned in interviews on Wednesday that they were
considering helping wage primary campaigns against Republican lawmakers
who had worked to engineer the political standoff in Washington
.

Such an effort would thrust Washington’s traditionally cautious and pragmatic business lobby into open warfare with the Tea Party faction, which has grown in influence since the 2010 election and won a
series of skirmishes with the Republican establishment in the last two
years.

“We
are looking at ways to counter the rise of an ideological brand of
conservatism that, for lack of a better word, is more anti-establishment
than it has been in the past,”
said David French, the top lobbyist at
the National Retail Federation. “We have come to the conclusion that
sitting on the sidelines is not good enough.”

Update on the Referendum (‘citizens veto’) of HB 2305, Voter Suppression Act

Posted by AzBlueMeanie:

Earlier this week, the Secretary of State's Office completed its review of the petitions for the referendum ("citizens veto") of HB 2305, the Voter Suppression Act. The Arizona Capitol Times (subscription required) reported, Secretary of State knocks 2,300 signatures from HB2305 referendum effort:

2305hb11The coalition fighting the election law approved by the Legislature this year filed 139,161 signatures that passed the first round of verification from the Secretary of State’s Office.

The office tossed 237 petition sheets
containing more than 2,300 signatures for technical reasons. An
unreported number of individual signatures were also thrown out for
technical reasons, said Matt Roberts, a spokesman for Secretary of State
Ken Bennett.

* * *

The remaining signatures must have an
overall validity rate of roughly 62 percent in order to force a
referendum against the law. Referendum backers like Robbie Sherwood,
spokesman for the Protect Your Right to Vote Campaign, are confident enough of the signatures will be validated to make it happen.

“To lose less than 5 percent (on the first review) we thought was
very good, and we were very happy with that. Certainly it’s not over,
and we’re not counting our chickens before they hatch, but we’re
confident we’ll have the signatures,” he said.

The Secretary of State’s Office announced Monday that it is sending a
random 5 percent sample of the 139,161 signatures to each of the
state’s 15 county recorders, who will check the validity of signatures
from their counties.


Within 15 days of receiving the 5 percent
sample, each county must calculate the percentage of valid signatures
from registered voters in the county and return the petition sheets,
along with the total validity rate, back to the Secretary of State’s
Office.