Democrats Upset as Dirty Money Supports ‘Clean’ Candidate Regina Romero

3
597

A sleazy flyer from a dirty money group arrived at Tucson voters’ homes last week, distorting candidate Steve Farley’s record, and boosting his primary opponent Regina Romero. Democrats at a meeting I attended were disgusted as they passed around cell-phone pictures of the flyer.

The appalling element is that it benefited Romero, who campaigns as “the clean election candidate,” who doesn’t take PAC money. The claim rings false when you realize the PACs have spent $510,506 on her campaign. The amount of money spent on the local mayor’s race is unprecedented.

Democrats were quick to react.

“It puts the lie to her claim that she’s a clean candidate,” said former Pima County Democratic Party Chair Don Jorgenson. “She did not disavow any outside PAC supporting her. She did not disavow any support from these outside shadowy groups that have attracted all this money. They are putting out the worst misleading mailer and attack ads we’ve ever seen in Tucson.” He spoke on KVOI radio AM1030 on Aug. 19.

He observed that that the Chispa Arizona PAC is supporting Romero in the mayor’s race. It is headed up by Laura Dent, Romero’s former chief of staff. Chispa Arizona has spent $231,535 to promote Romero.

Broadcaster John C. Scott said on the air, “If you nominate Regina Romero to be the Democratic nominee for mayor of Tucson, you are making a big mistake. This would be an unmitigated disaster. She is not qualified to be the mayor of this town. Her campaign, with this dark money, makes her the queen of dark money, pumping in over $300,000 on top of her ‘clean’ election money.”

The ocean of PAC money contrasted with Romero’s “clean candidate” statement prompted columnist Tim Steller to write ‘Clean’ label doesn’t fit PAC-aided mayoral candidate Regina Romero in the Arizona Star.

Ironically, Romero has endorsed the Outlaw Dirty Money campaign, which would expose the people who originally earned the money and gave it to a PAC.

Of course, it is illegal for Romero to coordinate with any of the PACs. No PAC has directly donated money to her campaign. But it’s a fine distinction and many Democrats don’t see her as the “clean” candidate.

Rebuttal of a nefarious smear

The “Mask comes off” flyer was sent by the “Institute for Policy and Politics,” which was registered on Aug. 2, apparently just to send out the flyer. It is a classic dirty money PAC, registered to Dominic Aleman of Phoenix. There is no phone number, email or website listed for the nefarious group.

“Turning a progressive record against me is outrageous. It’s typical Koch brothers’ politics that they usually run against a Democrat in a general election. This stuff is ugly and it’s unbelievable that Phoenix would spend this much money to get involved in our race. It’s all the more reason for people to stand up and elect someone who will stand up for Tucson in the mayor’s office.”

In a radio interview on Aug. 19, Farley rebutted the four lies in the flier that said:

“Voted against School Reform for tax credits for disabled students.” Farley responded, “that was a voucher bill from Rick Murphy [R-Phoenix] that tried to take money from public schools and shift them into unaccountable private schools. Every Democrat [in the legislature] voted against that.”

“Opposed a minimum wage increase.” Farley countered, “The measure they’re talking about is a Republican attempt to distract voters from the real minimum wage increase that passed. The Republican proposal would have frozen minimum wage at $7.65 an hour and never had any adjustment for inflation. So yeah, I voted against it as did all of the Democrats.”

“Voted against Free Speech on College Campuses.” Rebutting the lie, Farley said, “This was an attempt by conservatives to regulate speech on campuses, sponsored by Paul Boyer, a Republican. And all Democrats voted against it including me. And it was opposed by LUCHA.”

“Vehemently opposed law to bring more teachers into the Classroom.” Refuting the smear, Farley said,This is interesting. That was Sylvia Allen’s bill last year [She is a Republican from Snowflake, AZ]. It was her effort to eliminate teacher accreditation in Arizona and it was opposed by all the teachers and the AEA and voted against by all Democrats.”

“What’s upsetting about is that it’s twisting the truth to low information voters who might not know what the truth is,” Farley said.

Romero campaign attacked too

In response, Romero’s campaign manager, Nate Sigal, said, “Of course we hope this campaign returns to the issues. We have used the resources within our control to promote our positive vision for the City of Tucson, not petty attacks on our opponent(s). The same cannot be said of every candidate in this race. Unfortunately, we have no control over outside efforts just as our opponents have no control over the outside efforts attacking our campaign, including the most recent “Total N-Tegrity” mail piece.

Sigal was referring to an anti-Romero flyer headlined “Regina Romero Doesn’t Care Where Your Tax Dollars Go.” It is a crudely-made, semi-literate screed complaining about streets, police and fire funding, tax breaks for developers and eviction rates — all blaming Romero.

However, this is not a dirty money effort, because the “Total-N-Tegrity Committee” lists its leader, a phone number, email address and website.

The chair is Luis Gonzalez, a former PCC School Board member, and someone with a long history against anyone associated with Rep. Grijalva, who endorses Romero. the address is 2307 W. Horseshoe Pl., a residential home west of I-10 and south of Grant.

The state registration form lists a phone number 520.405.7505, an email address tosali@hotmail.com, and a website at https://totalntegrity.org.

Tragedy

The tragedy is that Tucson’s local races have now been corrupted. The total spent on the mayor’s race by all PACs and candidates approaches $1 million — a vast amount for a city of 262,000 registered voters. The dirty money adds an element of fraud and sleaze that Democrats find appalling.

John C. Scott summed up the situation with a quotation from Rudyard Kipling: “If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools.”

3 COMMENTS

  1. You gotta wonder what the big money thinks it is buying. More tax cuts? More privatization of the city workforce? More Rio Nuevos? Perhaps the super PACs can voluntarily reveal who is behind the cash. We need nationwide clean elections. That is the only way to eliminate the power of money in our government.

  2. I, too am a former west sider even to the extent of being the President of El Rio neighborhood and two time chairman of the westside LD 27, now LD 3 for the most part. I find the Farley “two faced” mailer repugnant as I do the mailer from Luis’ PAC. Luis is an organizer of long standing opposition to Romero and Grijalva. Their beef with them does not hold up to scrutiny especially considering the major development Romero has brought to the west side area now known as “The Mercado”. A rereading of the Bodine article looks more balanced than at first blush. I am glad Debbie C weighed in here as she made many good points. It is heartbreaking that this race has become so needlessly sullied.

  3. Larry — It’s hard to imagine why you are rehashing topics that have been well-covered by the Arizona Daily Star. The majority of votes have probably been cast. The Star had a news story and two local opinion columns about outside money in this primary.

    Better than outside money has been the advantage given to Steve Farley by the Arizona Daily Star. Yes, although the Star took the easy way out by endorsing Randi Dorman who is relatively unknown in Tucson, the Star ran two hit pieces on Regina Romero days before the ballots were mailed. The articles were widely distributed and commented on on social media.

    One involved one of Regina Romero’s campaign chairs, a Republican who has donated to Trump and other in the GOP. The Star could easily have run this information many weeks ago. It is public information, easily obtained. What an advantage for the Farley campaign to have this headlined in the morning newspaper just before ballots were mailed. Notably, the Star at that time neglected to report that Regina Romero’s other chair is Carolyn Campbell, one of Tucson’s most respected environmentalists.

    Second, the hit piece about Regina Romero’s relative’s arrest. The Star had the audacity to report that the police officer who left a letter and the police camera video on the councilperson’s desk, “had no political motive.” It took the Star until paragraph 10 to report that the chief of police and city attorney stated in writing that Ms. Romero had not contacted them in any way to get the charges reduced.

    John C. Scott has berated Regina Romero for years. Nothing new there. If you can stand it, listen to Garret Lewis on right wing KNST some morning. He makes fun of Ms. Romero’s name and for many months has had a steady spew of foul-mouthed attacks on her.

    Regina Romero also takes a lot of jabs, and dare I say hatred, from some particularly vitriolic individuals who disdain one of her supporters, Raul Grijalva.

    I have been impressed at the way Regina Romero has handled a barrage of criticism about outside money, which she doesn’t control, and the unfair treatment in the media. She has been professional and above the fray.

    Regina Romero is my councilperson. Despite the childish flyer with the toilet graphic that Luis A. Gonzales and his Total N-Tegrity mailed out which made it look like Ms. Romero is responsible for every overgrown weed and dilapidated building in her ward. Luis A. Gonzales has embarrassed himself. Whenever my husband and I have contacted the Ward 1 office, our concerns have been acted upon in a timely fashion.

    I know that I am joined by a large number of Tucsonans who have voted for Regina Romero with pride and excitement. From non-profit leaders to environmentalists to Tucsonans with deep roots to Tucson’s younger generation, Regina Romero has earned Tucson’s support. I look forward Mayor Regina Romero leading Tucson to a brighter future.

Comments are closed.